Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-04-20

M/S.VINAY SOLVENT EXTRACTION INDT. P.LTD vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUJARAT

Citation / case number
SC 2000/4466
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S.VINAY SOLVENT EXTRACTION INDT. P.LTD
Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUJARAT
Author
S. N. VARIAVA
Bench
S. N. VARIAVA,DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN,S. H. KAPADIA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of Notification No. 305/77 under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, determining that a manufacturer can authorize another entity to comply with excise liabilities. The Court held that the authorization by Vijay Oil Mill to Vinay Solvent Extraction Industries was valid, affirming that the latter was the actual manufacturer responsible for excise compliance. The appeal against the CEGAT's order was dismissed, upholding the lower tribunal's findings.

M/S.VINAY SOLVENT EXTRACTION INDT. P.LTD vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUJARAT · Niyam