Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-04-26

Pandit Dhana Mali vs Bhimabai (D) Th. Lrs.

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2005 SC 399
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Pandit Dhana Mali
Respondent
Bhimabai (D) Th. Lrs.
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, D.M. Dharmadhikari, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified that a judgment in second appeal can be subject to review under Rule 1 Order XLVII of the Civil Procedure Code, contrary to the High Court's assertion that such a remedy is misconceived. However, in the present case, the Court found that the petitioner did not establish sufficient grounds for review of the judgment. Consequently, the special leave petition was dismissed.

Pandit Dhana Mali vs Bhimabai (D) Th. Lrs. · Niyam