Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-04-11

Nityanand Rai vs State Of Bihar & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 2239
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Nityanand Rai
Respondent
State Of Bihar & Anr
Bench
N. Santosh Hegde, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the cancellation of bail under Section 437 of the CrPC can be justified if there is a threat to witnesses or if the accused has suppressed material facts. In this case, the High Court's decision to cancel the bail granted to the appellant was upheld due to evidence of witness intimidation and the appellant's failure to disclose prior convictions of co-accused. The Court emphasized the importance of ensuring a fair trial and protecting the integrity of the judicial process.

Nityanand Rai vs State Of Bihar & Anr · Niyam