Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-04-05

M/S Channy Enterprises vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 2228
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Channy Enterprises
Respondent
Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...
Author
Ruma Pal
Bench
Ruma Pal, C.K. Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 3-A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the determination of the annual capacity of production (ACP) must consider the operational capabilities of the furnaces. The Court found that the Commissioner erred in clubbing the capacities of both rolling mills since only one could operate at a time due to the shared motor. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the ACP should be calculated based on the operational constraints, thereby overturning the decisions of the lower authorities.

M/S Channy Enterprises vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... · Niyam