HARYANA URBAN DEV. AUTHORITY vs VINAY KUMAR

The Supreme Court held that a delay of 29 days in filing a Revision before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission should be condoned, as sufficient cause was demonstrated. The Court set aside the National Commission's order dismissing the Revision and remitted the matter back for disposal on merits, referencing the principles established in Ghaziabad Development Authority vs. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65. The appeal was allowed without costs.