Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-09-01

NIRMAL JEET KAUR vs STATE OF M.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2003/15034
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NIRMAL JEET KAUR
Respondent
STATE OF M.P.
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
C.K. THAKKER ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of anticipatory bail granted under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in the context of allegations under Sections 498A and 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The Court held that the High Court's order extending anticipatory bail was not maintainable as the stipulated period for applying for regular bail under Section 439 had lapsed. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order, emphasizing the need for adherence to procedural timelines in bail applications.

NIRMAL JEET KAUR vs STATE OF M.P. · Niyam