Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-09-24

H.U.D.A. vs MOHAN LAL GOYAL

Citation / case number
SC 2002/12103
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
H.U.D.A.
Respondent
MOHAN LAL GOYAL
Author
S. N. VARIAVA
Bench
S.N. VARIAVA & A.K. MATHUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that interest at the rate of 18% per annum cannot be uniformly granted by Consumer Forums without considering the specific facts of each case, as established in Ghaziabad Development Authority vs. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65. The Court emphasized that compensation for mental agony must correlate with actual loss or injury and that the National Commission's order was unsustainable for not adhering to these principles. The appeal was disposed of without costs, and the Court clarified that this order should not serve as a precedent in other matters.

H.U.D.A. vs MOHAN LAL GOYAL · Niyam