Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-09-10

UPKAR SINGH vs VED PRAKASH .

Citation / case number
SC 2001/9212
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UPKAR SINGH
Respondent
VED PRAKASH .
Author
SANTOSH HEGDE
Bench
N. SANTOSH HEGDE, S.B. SINHA & A.K. MATHUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court referred the case to a larger bench due to doubts about the correctness of the judgment in T.T. Antony vs. State of Kerala, 2001 (6) SCC 181. The Court examined the legality of the registration of a cross FIR under Sections 147, 148, 149, and 307 IPC after the commencement of an investigation, emphasizing that a fresh FIR is not mandatory if the investigation reveals a different version. The Court ultimately held that the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's revision petition was not justified, necessitating a re-evaluation of the legal principles involved.

UPKAR SINGH vs VED PRAKASH . · Niyam