Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-09-01

Nirmal Jeet Kaur vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2004 SC 736
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Nirmal Jeet Kaur
Respondent
The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of anticipatory bail granted under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in the context of a dowry harassment case involving Sections 498A and 506 IPC, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The Court held that the High Court's extension of anticipatory bail was improper as the stipulated period had lapsed, emphasizing that the conditions for granting such bail must be strictly adhered to. Consequently, the Court set aside the impugned order, reinforcing the necessity for compliance with procedural timelines in bail applications.

Nirmal Jeet Kaur vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Anr · Niyam