Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-09-10

Union Of India And Anr vs The State Of Assam

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 4867
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India And Anr
Respondent
The State Of Assam
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Prakash Prabhakar Naolekar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 concerning offences under the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966. The Court clarified that the learned Single Judge of the Guwahati High Court erred in interpreting Section 8 of the Act, which outlines the conditions under which bail may be granted. The Court held that the accused does not have an automatic right to bail and that the officer must assess the evidence before deciding on bail, thereby overturning the High Court's decision.

Union Of India And Anr vs The State Of Assam · Niyam