The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State ... vs Sohan Lal

The Supreme Court upheld the termination of the respondent's services by the appellant-Corporation, affirming the findings of the Industrial Tribunal that the termination was justified due to proven misconduct under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court ruled that the respondent had not completed 240 days of continuous service, thus the provisions of Section 25F were not applicable. The appeal against the Rajasthan High Court's decision was dismissed, confirming the legality of the termination.