Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-09-17

Subramanium Sethuraman vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 4711
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Subramanium Sethuraman
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Anr
Bench
N. Santosh Hegde, S.B.Sinha, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal concerning the discharge of accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court held that the Magistrate's power to recall the process and discharge an accused is limited, particularly after a plea of not guilty has been recorded, as per Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the discharge order, emphasizing that the statutory notice must conform to legal requirements, and the Magistrate cannot review his earlier order post-plea recording.

Subramanium Sethuraman vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr · Niyam