Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-09-10

Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. vs The State Of Assam

Citation / case number
2004CRILJ4647
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Respondent
The State Of Assam
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Prakash Prabhakar Naolekar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 can be filed for offences under the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966. The Court clarified that the learned Single Judge of the Guwahati High Court misinterpreted Section 8 of the Act regarding bail provisions, emphasizing that the officer must consider the sufficiency of evidence before granting bail. The Court upheld the Union of India's appeal, stating that the learned Single Judge's decision was incorrect and that the provisions of the Act must be properly applied in determining bail eligibility.

Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. vs The State Of Assam · Niyam