Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-09-24

Haryana Urban Development Authority & ... vs Vinay Kumar

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Haryana Urban Development Authority & ...
Respondent
Vinay Kumar
Author
S. N. Variava
Bench
S.N. Variava, A.K. Mathur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a delay of 29 days in filing a Revision before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission should be condoned, as sufficient cause was shown. The Court set aside the National Commission's order dismissing the Revision and remitted the matter back for disposal on merits, referencing the principles established in Ghaziabad Development Authority vs. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65. The appeal was allowed without costs.

Haryana Urban Development Authority & ... vs Vinay Kumar · Niyam