Supreme Court of India · 2004-09-24
Haryana Urban Development Authority vs Mukesh Kumar
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- Haryana Urban Development Authority
- Respondent
- Mukesh Kumar
- Author
- S. N. Variava
- Bench
- S.N. Variava, A.K. Mathur
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court held that interest cannot be uniformly granted at 18% per annum in consumer disputes, emphasizing that compensation must correlate with actual loss or injury as established in Ghaziabad Development Authority vs. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65. The Court set aside the National Commission's order for awarding interest without considering the specific facts of each case, directing recalculation of interest at 12% from the date of each deposit until payment. The appellants were instructed to deliver possession of the plot and repay any deducted TDS with interest.