Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-09-24

Haryana Urban Development Authority vs Mukesh Kumar

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Haryana Urban Development Authority
Respondent
Mukesh Kumar
Author
S. N. Variava
Bench
S.N. Variava, A.K. Mathur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that interest cannot be uniformly granted at 18% per annum in consumer disputes, emphasizing that compensation must correlate with actual loss or injury as established in Ghaziabad Development Authority vs. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65. The Court set aside the National Commission's order for awarding interest without considering the specific facts of each case, directing recalculation of interest at 12% from the date of each deposit until payment. The appellants were instructed to deliver possession of the plot and repay any deducted TDS with interest.

Haryana Urban Development Authority vs Mukesh Kumar · Niyam