Haryana Urban Development Authority vs Raj Laxmi

The Supreme Court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's decision to provide an alternate plot at the original price but modified the interest rate from 18% to 9% per annum. The Court reasoned that since the allottee was not suffering any loss or damage due to the alternate plot being provided, a lower interest rate was appropriate. The Court clarified that compensation for mental agony should be limited to cases where actual loss or damage is proven.