Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-10-14

FAIRGROWTH INVESTMENTS LTD. vs CUSTODIAN

Citation / case number
SC 2004/1308
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
FAIRGROWTH INVESTMENTS LTD.
Respondent
CUSTODIAN
Author
RUMA PAL
Bench
ARUN KUMAR RUMA PAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Special Court under The Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 does not have the power to condone the delay in filing a petition under Section 4(2) of the Act. The Court emphasized that the Act's provisions, particularly Section 4(2), impose a strict 30-day limitation period for filing objections to notifications issued under Section 3(2). The Court ruled that adherence to this timeline is essential to maintain the integrity and objectives of the Act, thereby dismissing the appeal.

FAIRGROWTH INVESTMENTS LTD. vs CUSTODIAN · Niyam