Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-10-14

Fairgrowth Investments Ltd vs The Custodian

Citation / case number
2005 AIR SCW 3076
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Fairgrowth Investments Ltd
Respondent
The Custodian
Author
Ruma Pal
Bench
Ruma Pal, Arun Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Special Court under The Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 does not possess the power to condone the delay in filing a petition under Section 4(2) of the Act. The Court emphasized that the statutory timeline of 30 days for filing objections is mandatory and cannot be extended by the Special Court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as the petition was filed beyond the stipulated period, affirming the strict adherence to the provisions of the Act.

Fairgrowth Investments Ltd vs The Custodian · Niyam