Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-10-06

In Re: "Rv", A Judicial Officer vs Unknown

Citation / case number
2004(2)ALD(CRI)921
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
In Re: "Rv", A Judicial Officer
Respondent
Unknown
Author
R.C. Lahoti
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, G.P. Mathur, Prakash Prabhakar Naolekar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of delay in criminal trials under Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC, emphasizing the need for timely examination of witnesses as mandated by Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The Court held that the trial court must take proactive measures to expedite proceedings and ensure compliance with High Court directives. The judgment reinforced the principle that judicial delays must be minimized to uphold the right to a fair trial, ultimately directing the trial court to adhere to a strict timeline for witness examination.

In Re: "Rv", A Judicial Officer vs Unknown · Niyam