Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-11-05

GOVERNMENT OF ORISSA vs M/S. ASHOK TRANSPORT AGENCY .

Citation / case number
SC 2001/3492
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GOVERNMENT OF ORISSA
Respondent
M/S. ASHOK TRANSPORT AGENCY .
Author
C.I.R.C. LAHOTI,G.P. MATHUR,P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN
Bench
C.J.I.R.C. LAHOTI,G.P. MATHUR,P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that an ex parte decree against the Charge Chrome Division of the Orissa Mining Corporation cannot be executed against the State Government, as the latter was not made a party to the proceedings before the decree was passed. The Court emphasized the necessity of following the procedure under Order XXII Rule 10 of the CPC, which requires the plaintiff to bring any party affected by an assignment or devolution of interest on record for the decree to be binding. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision that the decree was not executable against the State Government.

GOVERNMENT OF ORISSA vs M/S. ASHOK TRANSPORT AGENCY . · Niyam