Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-11-19

RISHIKUL BRAHMACHARYA ASH.COMMITTEE&ANR vs STATE OF UTTARANCHAL .

Citation / case number
SC 1998/19618
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RISHIKUL BRAHMACHARYA ASH.COMMITTEE&ANR
Respondent
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL .
Author
SRIKRISHNA
Bench
SHIVARAJ V. PATIL & B.N. SRIKRISHNA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's writ petition challenging the State Government's orders under Sections 3 and 4 of the Charitable Endowments Act, 1890, which vested the appellant's property in the Treasurer of Charitable Endowments, U.P. The Court ruled that the appellant's argument regarding the lack of a speaking order was addressed by the High Court's acceptance of supplementary affidavits providing necessary reasons and materials. The Court affirmed that the Charitable Endowments Act applied to the appellant despite its claims of being a purely religious institution.

RISHIKUL BRAHMACHARYA ASH.COMMITTEE&ANR vs STATE OF UTTARANCHAL . · Niyam