Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-11-29

BAL THACKREY vs HARISH PIMPALKHUTE

Citation / case number
SC 1997/2987
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BAL THACKREY
Respondent
HARISH PIMPALKHUTE
Bench
Y.K. SABHARWAL, D.M. DHARMADHIKARI & TARUN CHATTERJEE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the initiation of contempt proceedings under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, distinguishing between suo motu actions and those initiated by parties. The Court emphasized that the directions from P.N. Duda's case regarding the procedure for contempt petitions must be adhered to, particularly the requirement for the Chief Justice's involvement. The Court expressed doubts about the correctness of the Duda decision, leading to a referral for reconsideration by a larger bench, thus holding that the existing practice may not align with legal standards.

BAL THACKREY vs HARISH PIMPALKHUTE · Niyam