Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-11-23

M/S. Kores India Ltd., Chennai vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2004 SC 614
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. Kores India Ltd., Chennai
Respondent
Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, C.K.Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of excise duty on typewriter/telex ribbons under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, specifically referencing Section 11A and Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that cutting and spooling ribbons constitutes manufacturing, thus making the product liable for excise duty. Conversely, the Court accepted the assessee's argument in connected appeals, leading to the deletion of the duty levied by the Collector of Central Excise, Indore.

M/S. Kores India Ltd., Chennai vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... · Niyam