Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-11-29

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs State Of U.P. And Another

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 446
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation
Respondent
State Of U.P. And Another
Author
G. P. Mathur
Bench
Chief Justice, G. P. Mathur, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the scheme published under Section 68-C of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, was valid despite challenges from operators, as the High Court's quashing of the scheme was found to be erroneous. The Court emphasized that the delay in processing objections violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, but allowed the UPSRTC to publish a fresh draft scheme. The judgment reaffirmed the need for timely hearings and the importance of adhering to statutory provisions, ultimately upholding the validity of the scheme published on 13.2.1986.

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs State Of U.P. And Another · Niyam