Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-11-17

Registrar,High Court Of Gujarat & Anr vs C.G.Sharma

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 344
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Registrar,High Court Of Gujarat & Anr
Respondent
C.G.Sharma
Author
Ar. Lakshmanan
Bench
K.G.Balakrishnan, Ar. Lakshmanan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of sub-rule (4) of Rule 5 of the Gujarat Judicial Service Recruitment Rules, 1961, concerning the extension of probation periods. The Court held that the respondent, Mr. C.G. Sharma, could not be deemed confirmed in his position as Civil Judge after the expiration of the probation period due to unsatisfactory performance, as evidenced by adverse remarks and recommendations from the High Court. The termination of his services was upheld, affirming the High Court's decision to allow the Letters Patent Appeal and denying Mr. Sharma's claim for reinstatement and benefits.

Registrar,High Court Of Gujarat & Anr vs C.G.Sharma · Niyam