Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-11-04

Commissioner Of Central Excise, Pune vs Kripa Chemicals Pvt. Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 232
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Pune
Respondent
Kripa Chemicals Pvt. Ltd
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed two key issues regarding the calculation of cost of production for excisable products. It reaffirmed the principle established in Collector of Central Excise, Pune v. Daiichi Karkaria Limited (1999) that modvatted excise duty on raw materials should not be included in the cost of production. Additionally, it clarified that the profit earned by the job worker must be considered along with the value of raw materials and manufacturing expenses in determining the excisable value, as per the guidelines from Ujagar Prints etc. v. Union of India (1989). The appeal was disposed of in accordance with these principles.

Commissioner Of Central Excise, Pune vs Kripa Chemicals Pvt. Ltd · Niyam