Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-11-04

Shyam Sundar Sarma vs Pannalal Jaiswal And Others

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 226
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shyam Sundar Sarma
Respondent
Pannalal Jaiswal And Others
Author
P.K. Balasubramanyan
Bench
G.P. Mathur, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the application of Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in the context of setting aside an ex parte decree. The Court held that the dismissal of an appeal for default does not preclude a party from filing a petition under Order IX Rule 13, particularly when the delay in filing the appeal was condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The Court emphasized that procedural lapses should not deny a party the opportunity for a fair hearing, thereby allowing the appellant's application to proceed.

Shyam Sundar Sarma vs Pannalal Jaiswal And Others · Niyam