Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-11-02

Dharma Prathishthanam vs M/S. Madhok Construction Pvt. Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 214
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dharma Prathishthanam
Respondent
M/S. Madhok Construction Pvt. Ltd
Author
R.C. Lahoti
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, G.P. Mathur, P.P. Naolekar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the notice of the award must be served to the parties, and failure to respond within the stipulated time frame results in the dismissal of objections. The Court emphasized that the appellant's objections were filed beyond the 30-day limit from the notice publication date, leading to the dismissal of the objections without merit consideration. The Court upheld the lower courts' decisions, affirming the validity of the arbitration award in favor of the respondent.

Dharma Prathishthanam vs M/S. Madhok Construction Pvt. Ltd · Niyam