Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-11-04

J. K. Gupta vs D.G. Investigation & Registration & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 1197
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
J. K. Gupta
Respondent
D.G. Investigation & Registration & Ors
Author
B.N.Agrawal
Bench
B.N.Agrawal, H.K.Sema

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the Chairman of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission had the authority to adjudicate a case of criminal contempt under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The Court held that the contempt proceedings must be conducted by a Bench of at least two members as mandated by Section 18 of the Act, thus overturning the conviction of the appellant. The judgment emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements in contempt cases to ensure fair adjudication.

J. K. Gupta vs D.G. Investigation & Registration & Ors · Niyam