Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-05-07

T.T.G.INDUSTRIES, MADRAS vs COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAIPUR

Citation / case number
SC 1996/77773
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
T.T.G.INDUSTRIES, MADRAS
Respondent
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAIPUR
Author
B.P. Singh
Bench
B.P.SINGH. RUMA PAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Collector of Central Excise confirming the demand for excise duty on Hydraulic Mudguns and Tap Hole Drilling Machines, ruling that these constituted excisable goods under the Central Excise Tariff. The Court rejected the appellant's argument that the machines were immovable property and thus not subject to excise duty, citing the precedent in Narne Tulaman Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Controller of Central Excise. The Court also affirmed the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 8 lakhs for failure to comply with excise regulations, holding that the demand was not barred by limitation as the appellant had not made a full disclosure of the manufacturing activities.

T.T.G.INDUSTRIES, MADRAS vs COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAIPUR · Niyam