Supreme Court of India · 2004-05-05
UGAM CHAND BHANDARI vs COMMR. OF C.E., MADRAS
- Citation / case number
- SC 1996/20226
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- UGAM CHAND BHANDARI
- Respondent
- COMMR. OF C.E., MADRAS
- Author
- G.P. MATHUR.
- Bench
- G.P. MATHUR. CJI
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court addressed the classification of waterproofed fabrics under the Central Excise Tariff, determining that such fabrics fall under Heading 59.06 as impregnated or coated textiles, rather than Heading 52.07 as claimed by the appellant. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision regarding the applicability of the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, affirming the imposition of penalties under rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Court concluded that the Tribunal's interpretation of the tariff headings was correct and consistent with the statutory provisions.