Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-03-10

Union Of India (Uoi) vs Karam Chand Thapar And Brs. (Coal Sales) ...

Citation / case number
(SCSUPPL)2004(3)CHN144
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India (Uoi)
Respondent
Karam Chand Thapar And Brs. (Coal Sales) ...
Author
R.C. Lahoti
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, Ashok Bhan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the obligations of the Coal Company under the Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act, 1974, specifically regarding the payment of royalty for sand extracted for stowing operations. The Court held that the obligation to pay royalty is contractual, arising from the mining lease, and is owed to the Central Government as the successor of the dissolved Coal Board. The Court emphasized the statutory powers granted to the Central Government under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act to enforce compliance with stowing operations, thereby affirming the contractual nature of the royalty obligation.

Union Of India (Uoi) vs Karam Chand Thapar And Brs. (Coal Sales) ... · Niyam