Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-03-11

EXPRESS PUBLICATIONS(MADURAI) LTD. vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 2000/21498
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
EXPRESS PUBLICATIONS(MADURAI) LTD.
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Author
Y.K. Sabharwal
Bench
D.M. DHARMADHIKARI Y.K. SABHARWAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of paragraph 80(2) of the Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme, 1952, which excludes employees in the newspaper industry from the category of excluded employees despite their pay exceeding the prescribed limit. The Court held that the Central Government's power to frame the Scheme under Section 5 of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, is valid and that the definition of 'excluded employee' in paragraph 2(f) is constitutional. The judgment affirmed the applicability of the Scheme to the newspaper industry employees, thereby upholding the provisions of the PF Act.

EXPRESS PUBLICATIONS(MADURAI) LTD. vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam