Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-03-23

MOLY vs STATE OF KERALA

Citation / case number
SC 1998/5021
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MOLY
Respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT. DORAISWAMY RAJU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a Special Court designated under Section 14 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is essentially a Court of Session and must follow the procedures outlined in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, particularly Section 193, which prohibits a Court of Session from taking cognizance of an offence without prior commitment by a Magistrate. The Court found that the Trial Court's suo moto cognizance was improper, leading to the appeal being allowed and the convictions set aside. The judgment clarifies the distinction between 'trial' and 'inquiry' as per the definitions in the Code.

MOLY vs STATE OF KERALA · Niyam