Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-03-10

Joseph J. Kondody vs Michael Kuruvilla

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2004 SC 842
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Joseph J. Kondody
Respondent
Michael Kuruvilla
Bench
B.N. Agarwal, D.M. Dharmadhikari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court set aside the judgment rendered by the High Court, emphasizing that the compounding of the offense is permissible under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court held that once the parties have reached a compromise, the High Court's decision must yield to the principles of justice and reconciliation. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted for appropriate orders in light of the compounding.

Joseph J. Kondody vs Michael Kuruvilla · Niyam