Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-03-09

M/S Peico Electronics & Electricals & ... vs Union Of India & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 2669
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Peico Electronics & Electricals & ...
Respondent
Union Of India & Anr
Author
P. Venkatarama Reddi
Bench
P. Venkatarama Reddi, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Commission's order under Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, affirming that the appellant engaged in restrictive trade practices detrimental to public interest. The Court found that the appellant's termination of the dealership agreement with the complainant violated Section 33(1)(c), (b), (g), and (f) of the Act, as it restricted competition and imposed unfair conditions on the complainant. The Court directed the appellant to cease such practices and restore the dealership, ensuring supply levels consistent with previous years.

M/S Peico Electronics & Electricals & ... vs Union Of India & Anr · Niyam