Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-03-22

C.M. Beena And Anr vs P.N. Ramachandra Rao

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 2103
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
C.M. Beena And Anr
Respondent
P.N. Ramachandra Rao
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, Ar. Lakshmanan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the relationship between the parties was that of licensor and licensee, not landlord and tenant, as per the terms of the deed of licence dated April 1, 1981. The Court emphasized that the licensee had no estate or interest in the premises, and the license could be terminated with one month's notice as per Clause 7 of the agreement. The High Court's decision to set aside the lower courts' judgments and direct the appellants to vacate the premises was upheld, affirming the respondent's right to reclaim possession.

C.M. Beena And Anr vs P.N. Ramachandra Rao · Niyam