Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-03-29

State Of M.P vs S.P. Sales Agencies & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 2088
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of M.P
Respondent
S.P. Sales Agencies & Ors
Author
B.N. Agrawal
Bench
B.N. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision to quash the seizure of kattha and cutch under Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court held that the High Court erred in concluding that kattha and cutch were not forest produce as defined under Section 2(4) of the Act, emphasizing that proper legal procedures must be followed for confiscation. The appeals were allowed, reinstating the confiscation orders and the proceedings initiated under the Act.

State Of M.P vs S.P. Sales Agencies & Ors · Niyam