Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-03-11

Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd. ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 1950
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd. ...
Respondent
Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Author
D.M. Dharmadhikari
Bench
D.M. Dharmadhikari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of paragraph 80(2) of the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1952, which excludes employees of the newspaper industry from the category of 'excluded employees' despite their pay exceeding the prescribed limit. The Court held that the Central Government's power to define 'excluded employees' under Section 5 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, is valid and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. Consequently, the petition challenging the provision was dismissed, affirming the applicability of the Scheme to newspaper industry employees.

Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd. ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. · Niyam