Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-03-17

The State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Raj Gopal Asawa And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 1933
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Respondent
Raj Gopal Asawa And Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of 'dowry' under Section 304B and Section 498A IPC, emphasizing that demands made after marriage do not constitute dowry unless they are linked to the marriage itself. The Court held that the High Court's conclusion, which acquitted the accused due to lack of evidence for pre-marriage demands, was flawed. The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision, reinstating the Trial Court's conviction, as the evidence presented by witnesses was credible and established the demand for dowry.

The State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Raj Gopal Asawa And Anr · Niyam