Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-03-23

Moly And Anr vs State Of Kerala

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 1890
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Moly And Anr
Respondent
State Of Kerala
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a Special Court designated under Section 14 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is indeed a Court of Session, and thus, cognizance of offences under this Act cannot be taken without prior commitment from a Magistrate as per Section 193 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court emphasized that the trial must follow the procedures laid out in Chapter XVIII of the Code, affirming the necessity of a proper inquiry before trial. The appeals were dismissed, upholding the lower courts' decisions.

Moly And Anr vs State Of Kerala · Niyam