Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-06-04

State Of Haryana vs State Of Punjab And Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2004 SC 932
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Haryana
Respondent
State Of Punjab And Anr
Author
Ruma Pal
Bench
Ruma Pal, P. Venkatarama Reddi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the dispute over river water allocation between Punjab and Haryana under the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, specifically citing Section 78. The Court held that the agreement dated 13th December 1981, which mandated the timely completion of the Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal, was binding, and the failure of Punjab to complete its share constituted a breach. The Court emphasized the need for adherence to the settlement terms and the Tribunal's binding decision on water allocation, thereby upholding the principles of inter-state water disputes.

State Of Haryana vs State Of Punjab And Anr · Niyam