Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-07-28

STATE OF PUNJAB vs KASTURI LAL .

Citation / case number
SC 2003/15617
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF PUNJAB
Respondent
KASTURI LAL .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT S.N. VARIAVA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of a High Court judgment quashing charges against directors of a company under Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Court held that at the charge framing stage, the prosecution only needs to show sufficient material to proceed against the accused, and the High Court erred in requiring definitive proof of their involvement in the business operations. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order and reinstated the charges against the directors, emphasizing the applicability of Section 10 of the Act regarding accountability in corporate contraventions.

STATE OF PUNJAB vs KASTURI LAL . · Niyam