Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-07-26

Jeet Mohinder Singh vs Harminder Singh And Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2004 SC 940
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jeet Mohinder Singh
Respondent
Harminder Singh And Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that an application styled under Order XVI Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was improperly framed as it pertains to the tender of expenses to witnesses, not the recall of witnesses. The Court emphasized that while the substance of an application is important, parties must accurately cite the relevant provisions of law. The Court clarified that Order XVIII Rule 17 allows for the recall of witnesses at any stage, but the application in question did not meet the necessary legal criteria, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Jeet Mohinder Singh vs Harminder Singh And Anr · Niyam