Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-01-30

ACHINTYA K. SAHA vs M/S.NANEE PRINTERS

Citation / case number
SC 1999/3299
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ACHINTYA K. SAHA
Respondent
M/S.NANEE PRINTERS
Author
Kapadia
Bench
S.H. KAPADIA. P.VENKATARAMA REDDI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the agreement dated 5th July 1976 executed by Smt. Madhuri Bose was a valid license agreement and not a tenancy, thus affirming the trial court's finding that M/s Nanee Printers were licensees and not tenants. The Court emphasized that the license was revocable and did not confer any tenancy rights upon the respondents. Consequently, the appeal for eviction was dismissed, upholding the trial court's decision regarding the nature of the agreement and the rights of the parties involved.

ACHINTYA K. SAHA vs M/S.NANEE PRINTERS · Niyam