Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-01-16

Mehboob Dawood Shaikh vs State Of Maharashtra

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 2890
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mehboob Dawood Shaikh
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, where the appellant was accused of instigating a mob during communal riots, leading to serious injuries and threats against the complainant. The Court held that the allegations of threatening the complainant constituted sufficient grounds for bail cancellation, emphasizing the need to ensure the integrity of the judicial process and the safety of witnesses. Consequently, the Court upheld the Bombay High Court's decision to cancel the bail granted to the appellant.

Mehboob Dawood Shaikh vs State Of Maharashtra · Niyam