Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-01-22

Hem Raj, Etc vs Raja Ram & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 1489
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Hem Raj, Etc
Respondent
Raja Ram & Ors
Author
K.G. Balakrishnan
Bench
K.G. Balakrishnan, B.N. Srikrishna

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's reversal of the Sessions Court's conviction under Section 302 IPC was flawed, as it failed to properly appreciate the evidence presented, including eyewitness accounts and forensic reports. The Court emphasized that the prosecution had established the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, thus reinstating the conviction of Raja Ram and Pappu @ Raj Kumar under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34, and Hari Padam under Section 302 IPC read with Section 114. The appeal by the State was allowed, and the acquittal by the High Court was set aside.

Hem Raj, Etc vs Raja Ram & Ors · Niyam