Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-01-13

Ahmedabad Pvt. Primary Teachers' ... vs Administrative Officer And Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ahmedabad Pvt. Primary Teachers' ...
Respondent
Administrative Officer And Ors
Author
DHARMAD
Bench
Shivaraj V. Patil, D.M Dharmadhikari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, specifically Section 2(e), which defines 'employee'. The Court held that teachers employed by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation do not qualify as 'employees' under this definition due to the exclusionary clause, as their gratuity is governed by the Gratuity Regulations of the Municipal Corporation. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that teachers cannot claim gratuity under the Act.

Ahmedabad Pvt. Primary Teachers' ... vs Administrative Officer And Ors · Niyam