Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-02-24

STATE BANK OF PATIALA vs RAMESH CHAND KANOJI .

Citation / case number
SC 2002/23254
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE BANK OF PATIALA
Respondent
RAMESH CHAND KANOJI .
Author
,V.N. KHARE,S.B. SINHA,S.H. KAPADIA.
Bench
CJI.,V.N. KHARE,S.B. SINHA,S.H. KAPADIA.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (SBPVRS) issued by State Bank of Patiala, emphasizing that applications submitted under the scheme are irrevocable as per Clause 9(i). The Court held that the withdrawal of applications after the closure date of the scheme is not permissible, affirming the bank's discretion in accepting or rejecting applications based on operational requirements. The judgment clarified the binding nature of the scheme's terms and upheld the bank's authority in managing employee retirements under the SBPVRS.

STATE BANK OF PATIALA vs RAMESH CHAND KANOJI . · Niyam