Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-02-13

U.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD. vs U.P.RAJYA SETU NIGAM S.KARMACHARI SANGH

Citation / case number
SC 2002/22519
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD.
Respondent
U.P.RAJYA SETU NIGAM S.KARMACHARI SANGH
Author
RUMA PAL
Bench
B.P. SINGH. RUMA PAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the termination of the services of 168 workmen by the appellant, a Government company, was valid under Clause L-2.12 of the U.P. Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, which allows for termination due to absence without leave for more than 10 consecutive days. The Court emphasized that the workmen were duly notified of the consequences of their absence and failed to report back to work despite repeated notices. The Court upheld the termination order, affirming the employer's right to terminate employment under the specified standing orders.

U.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD. vs U.P.RAJYA SETU NIGAM S.KARMACHARI SANGH · Niyam